Marchesini Etologia Shop

Technophysiology,or How technology Modifies the self

Technophysiology,or How technology Modifies the self

Technophysiology,or How technology Modifies the self

Technophysiology, or How Technology Modifies the Self, 2023

Roberto Marchesini

2023 – CAMBRIDGE SCHOLARS PUBLISHING

pag.242

The book aims to address the theme of the transformation of the body by technology, offering

a general overview with a focus on new technologies. The technological development of the

last few centuries calls for a radical revision in our way of considering technology along with

its basic philosophical points of reference. The basic assumption of the essay is that we need

to go beyond the humanistic model which continues to view technology as a sort of garment

or a workshop that enables the human being to: improve its performance, pursue its goals,

provide tools for its verticalization/ascent in the world and emancipate the individual from

needs and fragilities. In order to understand the close relationship between the body and

technology, I will address the topic not only through an examination of the physiological

organization of the body in its relationship with the environment, but also by taking into

consideration the Evo-Devo theories that consider the body as an entity integrated within an

ecological niche. Because of the body’s plasticity and its adaptive capacity in ontogenesis,

technology has always modelled the somatic dimension of the human being. The dynamism of

human morpho-physiology, however, should not be attributed to an incompleteness or a

deficiency, but to its redundancy, something which confers virtuality to it. The book therefore

aims at revealing our need for a new anthropology, no longer based on biological deficiency,

but on the interactivity of the body. Thanks to its biological attributes – such as the

redundancy of the central nervous system or the musculoskeletal conformation – the body coevolved

with the technical device. Some of the cornerstones of the humanistic interpretation

have collapsed, such as the theory of human incompleteness, the ergonomic and disjunctive

dimension of technological support, the compensatory, amplifying and liberating vision of

technomediation, the self-sufficient reading of the ideational and design process, and the

presumption of full human control over the functions and structure of the machine.

The convergence of several technopoietic directives – such as nanotechnologies, biosynthesis

and neural networks – produces an acceleration of situations that surpass the capacity of the

traditional philosophies born in the wake of humanism to provide adequate interpretative

and predictive keys. The book stresses the extent to which we might face problems in

interpreting new technologies, if we continue to address them with inadequate philosophical

models: these models conceive technology as an instrument, that is, as a passive entity under

human control, whose function is external to the body. As this essay shows, we need to talk

about technophysiology, i.e., about a new way of reading our relationship with technology,

which is becoming growingly infiltrative and resembles more and more a partnership. We get

the impression that there is a considerable gap, even if only temporal, between what

technology makes possible and our philosophical ability to understand its consequences and

the existential spaces opened by the new supports. Cultural imaginary still relies on rhetorical

figures that do not allow us to grasp, even in a broad or partial way, the specific impact of a

technical innovation but, above all, what new existential dimensions and related fields of

research open up as well as what applications suddenly become possible. In just about forty

years, for example, the spreading of personal computers has profoundly changed people’s

lifestyles and, consequently, the cognitive functions addressed, required or neglected. As a

matter of fact, posture, prattognosis, attention system, the mechanisms of arousal and stress

have changed. Thanks to the progressive miniaturization of these supports and their

versatility, in a short time computer technologies have found their place in electronic games,

mobile phones and music track players, becoming the gadget par excellence. Caught in this

embrace, the body has made room for the computer: like in a successful transplant, this graft

has changed the way of thinking of individuals and their social expectations. The increasingly

immersive digital attendance, so assiduous as to involve the younger generations for over

eight hours a day, has had shocking effects on their psychological condition; today we are

already beginning to notice the consequences, which are not always pleasant, however, but

which reveal how deep these technologies have infiltrated.

Our somatic organization must always welcome and agree with the support, through

processes of reciprocal adjustment that involve both the development of peculiar techniques

of use and the coming about of new developmental pressures on the organism. When a

technical-mediated condition is inaugurated, the standards of performance and feedback on

the various organs are modified. Through the device, the body builds new perceptive and

operational interfaces with external reality, so we witness a transformation of the sensory

correction mechanisms, both of sensitivity and of agency. Undoubtedly, in acquiring the

instrument, the whole organism undergoes a profound change: it is a metamorphosis that

involves neurobiological wiring, the endocrine setting, the immune response, sexuality, the

musculoskeletal chassis, the great organic functions, the biorhythm and cell turnover. This is

the reason that prompts me to posit that technology is always infiltrative, that is to say, it

embodies itself, even when at first glance it might seem to limit itself to clothing the body,

wrapping it like a glove, protecting it from contamination.

New technologies require us to go beyond our traditional view and perception of devices and

define a new philosophy of téchne, which takes into account the ontological metamorphosis

triggered by our relationship with devices. In order to understand this aspect we need, first of

all, to shed light on the somatic changes that occur when the human being gets accustomed to

a new device enters . In this essay I want to examine the effects technology produces on the

body from the point of view of the morphological configuration and organization of functions.

I use the term technophysiology to refer to this impact, which is transforming our way of

“being in the world”: our perception of reality, the identity we build of ourselves, the

expectations we have and the meaning we attribute to our life. Being a body means, in fact,

living in coherence with the somatic dimension that characterizes us, but this is not free from

the modifications that technology imparts to the body.

Technophysiology,or How technology Modifies the self

Technophysiology,or How technology Modifies the self

Technophysiology, or How Technology Modifies the Self, 2023

Roberto Marchesini

2023 – CAMBRIDGE SCHOLARS PUBLISHING

pag.242

Technophysiology, or How Technology Modifies the Self, 2023

Roberto Marchesini

2023 – CAMBRIDGE SCHOLARS PUBLISHING

pag.242

The book aims to address the theme of the transformation of the body by technology, offering

a general overview with a focus on new technologies. The technological development of the

last few centuries calls for a radical revision in our way of considering technology along with

its basic philosophical points of reference. The basic assumption of the essay is that we need

to go beyond the humanistic model which continues to view technology as a sort of garment

or a workshop that enables the human being to: improve its performance, pursue its goals,

provide tools for its verticalization/ascent in the world and emancipate the individual from

needs and fragilities. In order to understand the close relationship between the body and

technology, I will address the topic not only through an examination of the physiological

organization of the body in its relationship with the environment, but also by taking into

consideration the Evo-Devo theories that consider the body as an entity integrated within an

ecological niche. Because of the body’s plasticity and its adaptive capacity in ontogenesis,

technology has always modelled the somatic dimension of the human being. The dynamism of

human morpho-physiology, however, should not be attributed to an incompleteness or a

deficiency, but to its redundancy, something which confers virtuality to it. The book therefore

aims at revealing our need for a new anthropology, no longer based on biological deficiency,

but on the interactivity of the body. Thanks to its biological attributes – such as the

redundancy of the central nervous system or the musculoskeletal conformation – the body coevolved

with the technical device. Some of the cornerstones of the humanistic interpretation

have collapsed, such as the theory of human incompleteness, the ergonomic and disjunctive

dimension of technological support, the compensatory, amplifying and liberating vision of

technomediation, the self-sufficient reading of the ideational and design process, and the

presumption of full human control over the functions and structure of the machine.

The convergence of several technopoietic directives – such as nanotechnologies, biosynthesis

and neural networks – produces an acceleration of situations that surpass the capacity of the

traditional philosophies born in the wake of humanism to provide adequate interpretative

and predictive keys. The book stresses the extent to which we might face problems in

interpreting new technologies, if we continue to address them with inadequate philosophical

models: these models conceive technology as an instrument, that is, as a passive entity under

human control, whose function is external to the body. As this essay shows, we need to talk

about technophysiology, i.e., about a new way of reading our relationship with technology,

which is becoming growingly infiltrative and resembles more and more a partnership. We get

the impression that there is a considerable gap, even if only temporal, between what

technology makes possible and our philosophical ability to understand its consequences and

the existential spaces opened by the new supports. Cultural imaginary still relies on rhetorical

figures that do not allow us to grasp, even in a broad or partial way, the specific impact of a

technical innovation but, above all, what new existential dimensions and related fields of

research open up as well as what applications suddenly become possible. In just about forty

years, for example, the spreading of personal computers has profoundly changed people’s

lifestyles and, consequently, the cognitive functions addressed, required or neglected. As a

matter of fact, posture, prattognosis, attention system, the mechanisms of arousal and stress

have changed. Thanks to the progressive miniaturization of these supports and their

versatility, in a short time computer technologies have found their place in electronic games,

mobile phones and music track players, becoming the gadget par excellence. Caught in this

embrace, the body has made room for the computer: like in a successful transplant, this graft

has changed the way of thinking of individuals and their social expectations. The increasingly

immersive digital attendance, so assiduous as to involve the younger generations for over

eight hours a day, has had shocking effects on their psychological condition; today we are

already beginning to notice the consequences, which are not always pleasant, however, but

which reveal how deep these technologies have infiltrated.

Our somatic organization must always welcome and agree with the support, through

processes of reciprocal adjustment that involve both the development of peculiar techniques

of use and the coming about of new developmental pressures on the organism. When a

technical-mediated condition is inaugurated, the standards of performance and feedback on

the various organs are modified. Through the device, the body builds new perceptive and

operational interfaces with external reality, so we witness a transformation of the sensory

correction mechanisms, both of sensitivity and of agency. Undoubtedly, in acquiring the

instrument, the whole organism undergoes a profound change: it is a metamorphosis that

involves neurobiological wiring, the endocrine setting, the immune response, sexuality, the

musculoskeletal chassis, the great organic functions, the biorhythm and cell turnover. This is

the reason that prompts me to posit that technology is always infiltrative, that is to say, it

embodies itself, even when at first glance it might seem to limit itself to clothing the body,

wrapping it like a glove, protecting it from contamination.

New technologies require us to go beyond our traditional view and perception of devices and

define a new philosophy of téchne, which takes into account the ontological metamorphosis

triggered by our relationship with devices. In order to understand this aspect we need, first of

all, to shed light on the somatic changes that occur when the human being gets accustomed to

a new device enters . In this essay I want to examine the effects technology produces on the

body from the point of view of the morphological configuration and organization of functions.

I use the term technophysiology to refer to this impact, which is transforming our way of

“being in the world”: our perception of reality, the identity we build of ourselves, the

expectations we have and the meaning we attribute to our life. Being a body means, in fact,

living in coherence with the somatic dimension that characterizes us, but this is not free from

the modifications that technology imparts to the body.

Technophysiology,or How technology Modifies the self

Technophysiology,or How technology Modifies the self

Torna in alto